The concept that restoring balance to the energy levels of the body can promote health and wellness is central to one type of alternative healing. This modality is known as energy therapy and it involves the manipulation of these biological force fields through one or more techniques which are used to bring about a state of equilibrium which some believe critical to improved health and recovery from illness.
First conceptualized in the Eastern world, this alternative healing modality continued to expand as technology introduced new advances in its understanding of magnetism, electricity and the like. While it has not gained the credibility of popular medical machines such as radiation and x-ray equipment, and it has yet to be proven scientifically, its practitioners continue to uphold its effectiveness.
Credited with the potential to reverse the disease process of many illnesses, including cancer, this healing modality is also believed to help relieve pain and boost one's immunity. Two possible approaches can be taken in its application; an external one that uses an energy-generating device or an internal one that draws strength from within the "biofields" of the body.
The former style of energy-field modifications are administered through the use of any one or combination of devices designed for this purpose. Most of these machines utilize such forces as electricity, magnetism, and microwave or infrared heat. Examples include the "Zapping" machine, Rife machine, and BioResonance tumor therapy.
The biofield approach seeks to influence the purported internal and surrounding energy fields of the human body. This can be achieved through physical contact between the practitioner's hands and the patient's body, or by using the hands but merely aligning them with the body and not actually touching it. Examples include healing touch, Reiki, and therapeutic touch, all of which share the common objective of balancing the body's energies.
To date there have not been any large-scale studies carried out to investigate the efficacy of these modalities. Although preliminary findings suggest the occurrence of positive effects associated with their use, this data mainly comes from individuals or smaller studies. While this is not sufficient evidence for the medical community, therapy of this nature does seem capable of minimizing adverse symptoms of many diseases, including cancer.
While biofield manipulation comes with no risks, electromagnetic stimulation carries the very uncommon risk of device malfunction, and it is not recommended for patients with defibrillators or pacemakers, but overall it is quite safe. However, this treatment is intended to complement conventional medical intervention, not replace it.
First conceptualized in the Eastern world, this alternative healing modality continued to expand as technology introduced new advances in its understanding of magnetism, electricity and the like. While it has not gained the credibility of popular medical machines such as radiation and x-ray equipment, and it has yet to be proven scientifically, its practitioners continue to uphold its effectiveness.
Credited with the potential to reverse the disease process of many illnesses, including cancer, this healing modality is also believed to help relieve pain and boost one's immunity. Two possible approaches can be taken in its application; an external one that uses an energy-generating device or an internal one that draws strength from within the "biofields" of the body.
The former style of energy-field modifications are administered through the use of any one or combination of devices designed for this purpose. Most of these machines utilize such forces as electricity, magnetism, and microwave or infrared heat. Examples include the "Zapping" machine, Rife machine, and BioResonance tumor therapy.
The biofield approach seeks to influence the purported internal and surrounding energy fields of the human body. This can be achieved through physical contact between the practitioner's hands and the patient's body, or by using the hands but merely aligning them with the body and not actually touching it. Examples include healing touch, Reiki, and therapeutic touch, all of which share the common objective of balancing the body's energies.
To date there have not been any large-scale studies carried out to investigate the efficacy of these modalities. Although preliminary findings suggest the occurrence of positive effects associated with their use, this data mainly comes from individuals or smaller studies. While this is not sufficient evidence for the medical community, therapy of this nature does seem capable of minimizing adverse symptoms of many diseases, including cancer.
While biofield manipulation comes with no risks, electromagnetic stimulation carries the very uncommon risk of device malfunction, and it is not recommended for patients with defibrillators or pacemakers, but overall it is quite safe. However, this treatment is intended to complement conventional medical intervention, not replace it.
About the Author:
Meeri Banks has studied reiki healing and all spiritual healing arts for over 15 years. Currently she has been working with the Ataana Method. If you would like to learn more about pranic healing method Nashville, TN, she suggests you visit her friends www.ataanamethod.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment